<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
>

<channel rdf:about="http://dcm.sagepub.com">
<title>Discourse &amp; Communication current issue</title>
<link>http://dcm.sagepub.com</link>
<description>Discourse &amp; Communication RSS feed -- current issue</description>
<prism:coverDisplayDate>August 2008</prism:coverDisplayDate>
<prism:publicationName>Discourse &amp; Communication</prism:publicationName>
<prism:issn>1750-4813</prism:issn>
<items>
 <rdf:Seq>
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dcm.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/2/3/219?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dcm.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/2/3/243?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dcm.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/2/3/271?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dcm.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/2/3/299?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dcm.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/2/3/321?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dcm.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/2/3/327?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dcm.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/2/3/333?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dcm.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/2/3/339?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dcm.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/2/3/347?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dcm.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/2/3/353?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dcm.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/2/3/356?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dcm.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/2/3/357?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dcm.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/2/3/363?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dcm.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/2/3/365?rss=1" />
 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
<image rdf:resource="http://dcm.sagepub.com:80/icons/banner/title.gif" />
</channel>

<image rdf:about="http://dcm.sagepub.com:80/icons/banner/title.gif">
<title>Discourse &amp; Communication</title>
<url>http://dcm.sagepub.com:80/icons/banner/title.gif</url>
<link>http://dcm.sagepub.com</link>
</image>

<item rdf:about="http://dcm.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/2/3/219?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Focus on form: foregrounding devices in football reporting]]></title>
<link>http://dcm.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/2/3/219?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>This article documents some foregrounding devices that the media use to attract                 readers' attention to linguistic forms, all identified in sports reports relating to                 the Euro 2004 Football Championship published in various British newspapers. A                 functional explanation is offered in terms of the poetic and interactive character                 of such devices and their role in simulating friendship and encouraging `bonding'                 between the writers and readers (phaticity). Their omnipresence in the British media                 is linked with structural characteristics of the English language, the readiness of                 the British to tolerate manipulation of linguistic forms, and the general trend                 towards `infotainment' in the media.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chovanec, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-29</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1750481308091908</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Focus on form: foregrounding devices in football reporting]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>242</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>219</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://dcm.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/2/3/243?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Examples as persuasive argument in popular management literature]]></title>
<link>http://dcm.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/2/3/243?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>In this article we take the use of examples as a means to explore the processes of persuasion and consensus-construction involved in the legitimation of popular management knowledge. Examples, as concrete instances or events used to substantiate a wider argument, have been variedly regarded in different research traditions. Classical logic and rhetoric have considered them an inferior form of argument, useful for pedagogic or public debate but inadequate for higher forms of thought. This spirit still permeates much psychological research on communication, where the great persuasive import of examples has been contrasted with more scientific and formal resources for argumentation. Considered in this light, the contingent and episodic nature of examples seems to make them cognitively inferior to explicit statements of general rules. However, various strands of research on the nature of scientific knowledge have shown that implicit forms of knowledge are an integral part of scientific expertise. Examples may thus be more central to disciplinary thought than the conventional normative view seems to allow. In this spirit, we explore the use of examples in a hotly contested field, that of popular discourse on business and management. The profusion of examples in this kind of writing has been often noted, and almost as often criticized. We seek to explore more fully how these examples are deployed, examining the discursive devices that mark examples within the development of the text, their function as rhetorical moves, and their role in presenting arguments that are never otherwise made explicit.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lischinsky, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-29</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1750481308091907</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Examples as persuasive argument in popular management literature]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>269</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>243</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://dcm.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/2/3/271?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Emergency communication: the discursive challenges facing emergency         clinicians and patients in hospital emergency departments]]></title>
<link>http://dcm.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/2/3/271?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Effective communication and interpersonal skills have long been recognized as                 fundamental to the delivery of quality health care. However, there is mounting                 evidence that the pressures of communication in high stress work areas such as                 hospital emergency departments (EDs) present particular challenges to the delivery                 of quality care. A recent report on incident management in the Australian health                 care system (NSW Health, 2005a) cites the main cause of critical incidents (that is,                 adverse events such as an incorrect procedure leading to patient harm), as being                 poor and inadequate communication between clinicians and patients. This article                 presents research that describes and analyses spoken interactions between health                 care practitioners and patients in one ED of a large, public teaching hospital in                 Sydney, Australia. The research aimed to address the challenges and critical                 incidents caused by breakdowns in communication that occur between health                 practitioners and patients and by refining and extending knowledge of discourse                 structures, to identify ways in which health care practitioners can enhance their                 communicative practices thereby improving the quality of the patient journey through                 the ED. The research used a qualitative ethnographic approach combined with                 discourse analysis of audio-recorded interactions. Some key findings from the                 analysis of data are outlined including how the absence of information about                 processes, the pressure of time within the ED, divergent goals of clinicians and                 patients, the delivery of diagnoses and professional roles impact on patient                 experiences. Finally, the article presents an in-depth linguistic analysis on                 interpersonal and experiential patterns in the discursive practices of patients,                 nurses and doctors.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Slade, D., Scheeres, H., Manidis, M., Iedema, R., Dunston, R., Stein-Parbury, J., Matthiessen, C., Herke, M., McGregor, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-29</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1750481308091910</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Emergency communication: the discursive challenges facing emergency         clinicians and patients in hospital emergency departments]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>298</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>271</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://dcm.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/2/3/299?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Organizational discourse and communication: the progeny of Proteus]]></title>
<link>http://dcm.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/2/3/299?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>As Van Dijk (2007) proposed in the first issue of <I>Discourse and Communication</I> , the main purpose of this journal is to bridge the two cross-disciplines of communication and discourse studies. Given this goal, this article sought to help clear the ground for such interdisciplinary development by investigating how organizational researchers use the terms `discourse' and `communication' and cast discourse&mdash;communication relationships. By reviewing 112 organizational discourse studies from major journals in communication, organizational studies, and interdisciplinary journals published between 1981 and 2006, this study identified diverse conceptualizations of these basic concepts. The findings help dispel some of the misunderstandings that scholars from one research field may possess toward the other and sort through some, if not all, the confusions regarding the terms `discourse', `communication', and their relationships.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guowei Jian,  , Schmisseur, A. M., Fairhurst, G. T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-29</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1750481308091912</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Organizational discourse and communication: the progeny of Proteus]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>320</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>299</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://dcm.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/2/3/321?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The communicative constitution of what? A response to Jian et al.]]></title>
<link>http://dcm.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/2/3/321?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Karreman, D., Alvesson, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-29</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1750481308091913</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The communicative constitution of what? A response to Jian et al.]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>325</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>321</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://dcm.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/2/3/327?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Discourse and/or communication: living with ambiguity]]></title>
<link>http://dcm.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/2/3/327?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bargiela-Chiappini, F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-29</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1750481308091914</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Discourse and/or communication: living with ambiguity]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>332</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>327</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://dcm.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/2/3/333?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Directions for thought leadership in discourse and communication: a commentary on Jian et al.]]></title>
<link>http://dcm.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/2/3/333?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Barker, J. R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-29</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1750481308091915</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Directions for thought leadership in discourse and communication: a commentary on Jian et al.]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>337</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>333</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://dcm.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/2/3/339?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Images of the communication-- discourse relationship]]></title>
<link>http://dcm.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/2/3/339?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Putnam, L. L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-29</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1750481308091916</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Images of the communication-- discourse relationship]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>345</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>339</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://dcm.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/2/3/347?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Communication and discourse: is the bridge language? Response to Jian et al.]]></title>
<link>http://dcm.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/2/3/347?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Taylor, J. R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-29</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1750481308091923</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Communication and discourse: is the bridge language? Response to Jian et al.]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>352</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>347</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://dcm.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/2/3/353?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The debate about organizational discourse and communication: a rejoinder]]></title>
<link>http://dcm.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/2/3/353?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guowei Jian,  , Schmisseur, A. M., Fairhurst, G. T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-29</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1750481308091924</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The debate about organizational discourse and communication: a rejoinder]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>355</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>353</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://dcm.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/2/3/356?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Book review: NANCY AALTO and EWALD REUTER, Aspects of Intercultural Dialogue. Theory. Research. Applications. Cologne: SAXA, 2006, 337 pp]]></title>
<link>http://dcm.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/2/3/356?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Benchiba, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-29</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1750481308091911</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Book review: NANCY AALTO and EWALD REUTER, Aspects of Intercultural Dialogue. Theory. Research. Applications. Cologne: SAXA, 2006, 337 pp]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>357</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>356</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://dcm.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/2/3/357?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Book review: EMANUEL A. SCHEGLOFF, Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis. Vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007. xvi + 300 pp]]></title>
<link>http://dcm.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/2/3/357?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Perakyla, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-29</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/17504813080020030402</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Book review: EMANUEL A. SCHEGLOFF, Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis. Vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007. xvi + 300 pp]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>363</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>357</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://dcm.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/2/3/363?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Book review: CHRIS BRAECKE, GEERT JACOBS, KATJA PELSMAEKERS and TOM VAN HOUT, Lodz Papers in Pragmatics. Special Issue on Discourse in Organizations. Lodz: Lodz University Press, 2006. 219pp. 25 (pbk)]]></title>
<link>http://dcm.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/2/3/363?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Schnurr, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-29</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/17504813080020030403</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Book review: CHRIS BRAECKE, GEERT JACOBS, KATJA PELSMAEKERS and TOM VAN HOUT, Lodz Papers in Pragmatics. Special Issue on Discourse in Organizations. Lodz: Lodz University Press, 2006. 219pp. 25 (pbk)]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>365</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>363</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://dcm.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/2/3/365?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Book review: ROSALIND GILL, Gender and the Media. Cambridge: Polity, 2007. vi + 291 pp]]></title>
<link>http://dcm.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/2/3/365?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Talbot, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-29</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/17504813080020030404</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Book review: ROSALIND GILL, Gender and the Media. Cambridge: Polity, 2007. vi + 291 pp]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>368</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>365</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

</rdf:RDF>