<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
>

<channel rdf:about="http://dcm.sagepub.com">
<title>Discourse &amp; Communication recent issues</title>
<link>http://dcm.sagepub.com</link>
<description>Discourse &amp; Communication RSS feed -- recent issues</description>
<prism:publicationName>Discourse &amp; Communication</prism:publicationName>
<prism:issn>1750-4813</prism:issn>
<items>
 <rdf:Seq>
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dcm.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/2/3/219?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dcm.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/2/3/243?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dcm.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/2/3/271?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dcm.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/2/3/299?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dcm.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/2/3/321?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dcm.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/2/3/327?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dcm.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/2/3/333?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dcm.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/2/3/339?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dcm.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/2/3/347?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dcm.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/2/3/353?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dcm.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/2/3/356?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dcm.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/2/3/357?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dcm.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/2/3/363?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dcm.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/2/3/365?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dcm.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/2/2/115?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dcm.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/2/2/143?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dcm.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/2/2/165?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dcm.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/2/2/185?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dcm.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/2/2/205?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dcm.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/2/2/207?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dcm.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/2/2/209?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dcm.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/2/1/5?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dcm.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/2/1/29?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dcm.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/2/1/57?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dcm.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/2/1/79?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dcm.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/2/1/97?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dcm.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/2/1/100?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dcm.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/2/1/103?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dcm.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/2/1/105?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dcm.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/1/4/387?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dcm.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/1/4/407?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dcm.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/1/4/433?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dcm.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/1/4/452?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dcm.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/1/4/480?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dcm.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/1/4/482?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dcm.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/1/4/484?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dcm.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/1/4/486?rss=1" />
 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
<image rdf:resource="http://dcm.sagepub.com:80/icons/banner/title.gif" />
</channel>

<image rdf:about="http://dcm.sagepub.com:80/icons/banner/title.gif">
<title>Discourse &amp; Communication</title>
<url>http://dcm.sagepub.com:80/icons/banner/title.gif</url>
<link>http://dcm.sagepub.com</link>
</image>

<item rdf:about="http://dcm.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/2/3/219?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Focus on form: foregrounding devices in football reporting]]></title>
<link>http://dcm.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/2/3/219?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>This article documents some foregrounding devices that the media use to attract                 readers' attention to linguistic forms, all identified in sports reports relating to                 the Euro 2004 Football Championship published in various British newspapers. A                 functional explanation is offered in terms of the poetic and interactive character                 of such devices and their role in simulating friendship and encouraging `bonding'                 between the writers and readers (phaticity). Their omnipresence in the British media                 is linked with structural characteristics of the English language, the readiness of                 the British to tolerate manipulation of linguistic forms, and the general trend                 towards `infotainment' in the media.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chovanec, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-29</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1750481308091908</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Focus on form: foregrounding devices in football reporting]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>242</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>219</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://dcm.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/2/3/243?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Examples as persuasive argument in popular management literature]]></title>
<link>http://dcm.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/2/3/243?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>In this article we take the use of examples as a means to explore the processes of persuasion and consensus-construction involved in the legitimation of popular management knowledge. Examples, as concrete instances or events used to substantiate a wider argument, have been variedly regarded in different research traditions. Classical logic and rhetoric have considered them an inferior form of argument, useful for pedagogic or public debate but inadequate for higher forms of thought. This spirit still permeates much psychological research on communication, where the great persuasive import of examples has been contrasted with more scientific and formal resources for argumentation. Considered in this light, the contingent and episodic nature of examples seems to make them cognitively inferior to explicit statements of general rules. However, various strands of research on the nature of scientific knowledge have shown that implicit forms of knowledge are an integral part of scientific expertise. Examples may thus be more central to disciplinary thought than the conventional normative view seems to allow. In this spirit, we explore the use of examples in a hotly contested field, that of popular discourse on business and management. The profusion of examples in this kind of writing has been often noted, and almost as often criticized. We seek to explore more fully how these examples are deployed, examining the discursive devices that mark examples within the development of the text, their function as rhetorical moves, and their role in presenting arguments that are never otherwise made explicit.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lischinsky, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-29</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1750481308091907</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Examples as persuasive argument in popular management literature]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>269</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>243</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://dcm.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/2/3/271?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Emergency communication: the discursive challenges facing emergency         clinicians and patients in hospital emergency departments]]></title>
<link>http://dcm.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/2/3/271?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Effective communication and interpersonal skills have long been recognized as                 fundamental to the delivery of quality health care. However, there is mounting                 evidence that the pressures of communication in high stress work areas such as                 hospital emergency departments (EDs) present particular challenges to the delivery                 of quality care. A recent report on incident management in the Australian health                 care system (NSW Health, 2005a) cites the main cause of critical incidents (that is,                 adverse events such as an incorrect procedure leading to patient harm), as being                 poor and inadequate communication between clinicians and patients. This article                 presents research that describes and analyses spoken interactions between health                 care practitioners and patients in one ED of a large, public teaching hospital in                 Sydney, Australia. The research aimed to address the challenges and critical                 incidents caused by breakdowns in communication that occur between health                 practitioners and patients and by refining and extending knowledge of discourse                 structures, to identify ways in which health care practitioners can enhance their                 communicative practices thereby improving the quality of the patient journey through                 the ED. The research used a qualitative ethnographic approach combined with                 discourse analysis of audio-recorded interactions. Some key findings from the                 analysis of data are outlined including how the absence of information about                 processes, the pressure of time within the ED, divergent goals of clinicians and                 patients, the delivery of diagnoses and professional roles impact on patient                 experiences. Finally, the article presents an in-depth linguistic analysis on                 interpersonal and experiential patterns in the discursive practices of patients,                 nurses and doctors.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Slade, D., Scheeres, H., Manidis, M., Iedema, R., Dunston, R., Stein-Parbury, J., Matthiessen, C., Herke, M., McGregor, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-29</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1750481308091910</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Emergency communication: the discursive challenges facing emergency         clinicians and patients in hospital emergency departments]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>298</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>271</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://dcm.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/2/3/299?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Organizational discourse and communication: the progeny of Proteus]]></title>
<link>http://dcm.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/2/3/299?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>As Van Dijk (2007) proposed in the first issue of <I>Discourse and Communication</I> , the main purpose of this journal is to bridge the two cross-disciplines of communication and discourse studies. Given this goal, this article sought to help clear the ground for such interdisciplinary development by investigating how organizational researchers use the terms `discourse' and `communication' and cast discourse&mdash;communication relationships. By reviewing 112 organizational discourse studies from major journals in communication, organizational studies, and interdisciplinary journals published between 1981 and 2006, this study identified diverse conceptualizations of these basic concepts. The findings help dispel some of the misunderstandings that scholars from one research field may possess toward the other and sort through some, if not all, the confusions regarding the terms `discourse', `communication', and their relationships.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guowei Jian,  , Schmisseur, A. M., Fairhurst, G. T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-29</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1750481308091912</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Organizational discourse and communication: the progeny of Proteus]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>320</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>299</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://dcm.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/2/3/321?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The communicative constitution of what? A response to Jian et al.]]></title>
<link>http://dcm.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/2/3/321?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Karreman, D., Alvesson, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-29</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1750481308091913</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The communicative constitution of what? A response to Jian et al.]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>325</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>321</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://dcm.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/2/3/327?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Discourse and/or communication: living with ambiguity]]></title>
<link>http://dcm.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/2/3/327?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bargiela-Chiappini, F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-29</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1750481308091914</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Discourse and/or communication: living with ambiguity]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>332</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>327</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://dcm.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/2/3/333?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Directions for thought leadership in discourse and communication: a commentary on Jian et al.]]></title>
<link>http://dcm.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/2/3/333?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Barker, J. R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-29</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1750481308091915</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Directions for thought leadership in discourse and communication: a commentary on Jian et al.]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>337</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>333</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://dcm.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/2/3/339?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Images of the communication-- discourse relationship]]></title>
<link>http://dcm.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/2/3/339?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Putnam, L. L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-29</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1750481308091916</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Images of the communication-- discourse relationship]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>345</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>339</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://dcm.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/2/3/347?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Communication and discourse: is the bridge language? Response to Jian et al.]]></title>
<link>http://dcm.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/2/3/347?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Taylor, J. R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-29</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1750481308091923</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Communication and discourse: is the bridge language? Response to Jian et al.]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>352</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>347</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://dcm.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/2/3/353?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The debate about organizational discourse and communication: a rejoinder]]></title>
<link>http://dcm.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/2/3/353?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guowei Jian,  , Schmisseur, A. M., Fairhurst, G. T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-29</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1750481308091924</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The debate about organizational discourse and communication: a rejoinder]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>355</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>353</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://dcm.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/2/3/356?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Book review: NANCY AALTO and EWALD REUTER, Aspects of Intercultural Dialogue. Theory. Research. Applications. Cologne: SAXA, 2006, 337 pp]]></title>
<link>http://dcm.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/2/3/356?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Benchiba, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-29</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1750481308091911</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Book review: NANCY AALTO and EWALD REUTER, Aspects of Intercultural Dialogue. Theory. Research. Applications. Cologne: SAXA, 2006, 337 pp]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>357</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>356</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://dcm.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/2/3/357?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Book review: EMANUEL A. SCHEGLOFF, Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis. Vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007. xvi + 300 pp]]></title>
<link>http://dcm.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/2/3/357?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Perakyla, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-29</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/17504813080020030402</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Book review: EMANUEL A. SCHEGLOFF, Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis. Vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007. xvi + 300 pp]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>363</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>357</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://dcm.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/2/3/363?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Book review: CHRIS BRAECKE, GEERT JACOBS, KATJA PELSMAEKERS and TOM VAN HOUT, Lodz Papers in Pragmatics. Special Issue on Discourse in Organizations. Lodz: Lodz University Press, 2006. 219pp. 25 (pbk)]]></title>
<link>http://dcm.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/2/3/363?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Schnurr, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-29</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/17504813080020030403</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Book review: CHRIS BRAECKE, GEERT JACOBS, KATJA PELSMAEKERS and TOM VAN HOUT, Lodz Papers in Pragmatics. Special Issue on Discourse in Organizations. Lodz: Lodz University Press, 2006. 219pp. 25 (pbk)]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>365</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>363</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://dcm.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/2/3/365?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Book review: ROSALIND GILL, Gender and the Media. Cambridge: Polity, 2007. vi + 291 pp]]></title>
<link>http://dcm.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/2/3/365?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Talbot, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-29</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/17504813080020030404</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Book review: ROSALIND GILL, Gender and the Media. Cambridge: Polity, 2007. vi + 291 pp]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>368</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>365</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://dcm.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/2/2/115?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Propaganda in the trivial: puzzles in the women's section of the Volkischer Beobachter]]></title>
<link>http://dcm.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/2/2/115?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>This article examines word-based puzzles as texts. In particular, it analyzes the potential of using a seemingly harmless pastime &mdash; the solving of puzzles &mdash; for propagandistic ends. Propaganda is an attempt to manipulate and dominate discourses some of whose manifestations are texts. Because a thorough examination of puzzles has not yet been undertaken, word-based puzzles will be considered first in general, followed by a detailed examination of the potential propagandistic impact of puzzles drawn from the official Nazi newspaper, <I>V&ouml;lkischer Beobachter</I> [Folkish Observer].</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Barbe, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-16</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1750481307088480</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Propaganda in the trivial: puzzles in the women's section of the Volkischer Beobachter]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>141</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>115</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://dcm.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/2/2/143?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Aspects of sequential organization in text message exchange]]></title>
<link>http://dcm.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/2/2/143?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>This article builds on a range of work analysing interactive properties of text-based technologically mediated communication (e.g. email, internet relay chat, text messaging) which has revealed its deeply interactive properties. Based on a corpus of 1250 SMS text messages, it examines in detail the sequential organization revealed in extended series of text exchanges. Adopting methods and findings from conversation analysis, the study looks at the internal construction of texts as interactive artefacts, focusing on the production of both single-unit and multi-unit messages, and analyses how participants construct exchanges that show both similarities and differences with sequential organization in verbal conversation.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hutchby, I., Tanna, V.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-16</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1750481307088481</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Aspects of sequential organization in text message exchange]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>164</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>143</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://dcm.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/2/2/165?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Moral muting in US newspaper op-eds debating the attack on Iraq]]></title>
<link>http://dcm.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/2/2/165?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>This article examines a distinct form of moral argumentation found to be common in a corpus of 500 editorials and opinion pieces written in 23 US newspapers and news magazines between August and October 2002 debating whether or not the US should attack Iraq. The purpose of the article is to delineate this communicative phenomenon, which we call <I>moral muting</I> . Moral muting occurs when a message either blunts the moral considerations involved in a case or presents an equivocal moral meaning. Moral muting overlaps with but is distinct from mitigation, and even when it involves mitigation, moral muting depends on devices that go beyond those generally associated with conversational mitigation. The examination of moral muting offered here contributes to a better understanding of moral communication in general and of the conduct of the American public sphere.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Porpora, D. V., Nikolaev, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-16</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1750481307088482</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Moral muting in US newspaper op-eds debating the attack on Iraq]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>184</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>165</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://dcm.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/2/2/185?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[From cultural adaptation to cross-cultural discursive competence]]></title>
<link>http://dcm.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/2/2/185?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Cross-cultural competence is often studied as part of the foreigner's one-way                 adaptation to the host culture while ignoring the dynamic nature of adaptation at                 the discourse level of interactions. To address this issue, this article proposes a                 conceptual model to study cross-cultural discursive competence exhibited in                 individual interactions in business settings. The model is based on relational                 empathy and genre theories and, in particular, it develops the notional concepts of                 `cultural space' and `text reconstruction' that stress a two-way cultural adaptation                 underpinned by building relational empathy and intercultural alliances. In addition,                 the study proposes that the triangulation of cultural, institutional and                 sociocognitive spaces is the key to understanding and interpreting text                 reconstruction as a dynamic process of two-way cultural adaptation. The three-space                 model is exemplified through an analysis of cross-cultural interactions that                 occurred at a business negotiation meeting.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yunxia Zhu,  ]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-16</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1750481307088483</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[From cultural adaptation to cross-cultural discursive competence]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>204</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>185</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://dcm.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/2/2/205?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Book review: FRANCESCA BARGIELA-CHIAPPINI, CATHERINE NICKERSON and BRIGITTE PLANKEN, Business Discourse. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007, 282 + xiv pp, {pound}19.99. ISBN 1403935769 (pbk)]]></title>
<link>http://dcm.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/2/2/205?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[O'Rourke, B. K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-16</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1750481307088484</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Book review: FRANCESCA BARGIELA-CHIAPPINI, CATHERINE NICKERSON and BRIGITTE PLANKEN, Business Discourse. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007, 282 + xiv pp, {pound}19.99. ISBN 1403935769 (pbk)]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>207</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>205</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://dcm.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/2/2/207?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Book review: DAVID SILVERMAN, Interpreting Qualitative Data: Methods for Analyzing Talk, Text and Interaction. Los Angeles/London/New Delhi: SAGE, 2006, xv + 428 pp., $46.95. ISBN 9781412922456 (pbk)]]></title>
<link>http://dcm.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/2/2/207?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zhong Hong,  ]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-16</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/17504813080020020502</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Book review: DAVID SILVERMAN, Interpreting Qualitative Data: Methods for Analyzing Talk, Text and Interaction. Los Angeles/London/New Delhi: SAGE, 2006, xv + 428 pp., $46.95. ISBN 9781412922456 (pbk)]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>209</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>207</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://dcm.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/2/2/209?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Book review: SHI-XU (ed.), Discourse as Cultural Struggle. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press, 2007, pp. xiv + 200]]></title>
<link>http://dcm.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/2/2/209?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hailong Tian,  ]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-16</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/17504813080020020503</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Book review: SHI-XU (ed.), Discourse as Cultural Struggle. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press, 2007, pp. xiv + 200]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>212</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>209</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://dcm.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/2/1/5?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA['This poll has not happened yet': temporal play in election predictions]]></title>
<link>http://dcm.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/2/1/5?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Although the past plays a large part in election campaigns, predictions and promises                 are its lifeblood, with the various parties promising great things if elected and                 predicting doom if not. Indeed the `manifestos' usually published at the beginning                 of an election campaign are a study in pledges, promises and wishes that parties use                 to entice the electorate to vote for them. Whilst talk of the future often dominates                 election discourse, one aspect of the future that is largely passed over without                 comment is the actual make up of the result, despite the relentless publication of                 opinion polls results. However, towards the end of the general election campaign in                 the UK in 2001, the Conservative Party began to warn of the dangers of the Labour                 Party winning the election by a large majority. The media gave wide prominence to                 this event, seen as tantamount to conceding defeat to the Labour Party, though the                 reaction of all the main political parties was to downplay its significance. In this                 article, we explore the discursive manipulation of temporal relations in the 2001                 election campaign, and the politicians' work in gaining political capital out of the                 Conservative Party `breach' in the routine election prediction structure.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jaworski, A., Fitzgerald, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-02-13</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1750481307085574</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA['This poll has not happened yet': temporal play in election predictions]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>27</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-02-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>5</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://dcm.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/2/1/29?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Surging ahead to a new way forward: the metaphorical foreshadowing of a         policy shift]]></title>
<link>http://dcm.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/2/1/29?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>The role of metaphor in political discourse has received significant attention in                 recent years. Expanding on the cognitive theory of metaphor developed by Lakoff and                 Johnson (1980), scholars in the fields of sociolinguistics and discourse analysis                 have examined politicians' use of metaphorical concepts to justify policies and                 define events. The metaphors examined in these studies frequently have attained the                 status of idioms; they consequently pass unnoticed while retaining their ability to                 frame perspectives. However, political discourse does not limit itself to such                 lexicalized metaphors, but makes use of new metaphors (or new uses of existing                 metaphors) as well. Such uses are specifically designed to attract attention, which                 may become problematic if the metaphor is rejected, resulting in a classic `failure                 to launch'. This article examines such a case. Through an analysis of the metaphors                 used to describe President Bush's military plan to increase US forces in Iraq, I                 explore the mechanisms by which the meanings of novel metaphors are negotiated in                 the political arena, and demonstrate that, although their vivid imagery can generate                 persuasive force in political language, this effect may backfire when they encounter                 resistance.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hobbs, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-02-13</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1750481307085576</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Surging ahead to a new way forward: the metaphorical foreshadowing of a         policy shift]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>56</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-02-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>29</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://dcm.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/2/1/57?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Re-branding academic institutions with corporate advertising: a genre         perspective]]></title>
<link>http://dcm.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/2/1/57?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>The end of the 1990s witnessed the corporatization of public universities in Malaysia                 resulting in the publication of corporate literature in these universities and the                 type of writing Fairclough (1993) refers to as the marketization of academic                 discourse. Marketization is necessary in public universities due to stiff                 competition in attracting students among the public universities as well as from the                 increasing number of private universities. This article reports how Malaysian                 universities re-brand themselves using the results of an investigation on corporate                 brochures from these universities. The investigation employs a structural analysis                 and a textual analysis. Although informative in nature, these corporate brochures                 exhibit the use of promotional elements in the texts as seen in the contents and the                 language use. The communicative functions of university brochures are viewed to be                 more promotional than informative.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Osman, H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-02-13</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1750481307085577</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Re-branding academic institutions with corporate advertising: a genre         perspective]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>77</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-02-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>57</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://dcm.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/2/1/79?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Guiding metaphors of nationalism: the Cyprus issue and the construction of Turkish national identity in online discussions]]></title>
<link>http://dcm.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/2/1/79?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>This article is a study of three major metaphors organizing nationalistic discourse about Cyprus in two online forums for Turkish university students. The analysis suggests that discussants symbolically warranted their constructions of the future of Cyprus and Turkish Cypriots with metaphors of blood and heroism that emphasized their personal and collective memory of sacrifice. Sports metaphors were used predominantly to convey a sense of the strategic importance of Cyprus. In addition, discussants employed gender and sexual metaphors to structure the tension between nationalist feelings associated with motherland Turkey as a pure, virgin female, and the geopolitical demands of the nation-state, portrayed as a father faced with uneasy choices.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Baruh, L., Popescu, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-02-13</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1750481307085578</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Guiding metaphors of nationalism: the Cyprus issue and the construction of Turkish national identity in online discussions]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>96</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-02-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>79</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://dcm.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/2/1/97?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Book review: JOHN MYHILL, Language, Religion and National Identity in Europe and the Middle East. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, 2006, ix + 300 pp., US$138.00. ISBN 902722711X]]></title>
<link>http://dcm.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/2/1/97?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Babaii, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-02-13</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1750481307085580</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Book review: JOHN MYHILL, Language, Religion and National Identity in Europe and the Middle East. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, 2006, ix + 300 pp., US$138.00. ISBN 902722711X]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>100</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-02-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>97</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://dcm.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/2/1/100?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Book review: RUTH E. PAGE, Literary and Linguistic Approaches to Feminist Narratology. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2006, x + 209 pp., {pound}47. ISBN 1403991162 (hbk)]]></title>
<link>http://dcm.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/2/1/100?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Erkazanci, H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-02-13</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/17504813080020010502</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Book review: RUTH E. PAGE, Literary and Linguistic Approaches to Feminist Narratology. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2006, x + 209 pp., {pound}47. ISBN 1403991162 (hbk)]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>102</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-02-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>100</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://dcm.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/2/1/103?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Book review: CHAIM NOY, A Narrative Community: Voices of Israeli Backpackers. Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press, 2007]]></title>
<link>http://dcm.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/2/1/103?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cavaglion, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-02-13</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/17504813080020010503</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Book review: CHAIM NOY, A Narrative Community: Voices of Israeli Backpackers. Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press, 2007]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>105</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-02-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>103</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://dcm.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/2/1/105?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Book review: CHRIS BRAECKE, GEERT JACOBS, KATJA PELSMAEKERS and TOM VAN HOUT, Lodz Papers in Pragmatics: Special Issue on Discourse in Organizations. Lodz: Lodz University Press, 2006, 219 pp]]></title>
<link>http://dcm.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/2/1/105?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nickerson, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-02-13</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/17504813080020010504</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Book review: CHRIS BRAECKE, GEERT JACOBS, KATJA PELSMAEKERS and TOM VAN HOUT, Lodz Papers in Pragmatics: Special Issue on Discourse in Organizations. Lodz: Lodz University Press, 2006, 219 pp]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>108</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-02-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>105</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://dcm.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/1/4/387?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Neutralism and adversarial challenges in the political news interview]]></title>
<link>http://dcm.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/1/4/387?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>This article aims to examine journalists' adversarial challenges within the                 Australian political news interview. Within the Australian context, journalists tend                 to challenge interviewees: (1) by challenging the content of the prior turn, (2) by                 `interrupting' the prior turn, and (3) by initially presenting their challenge as a                 freestanding assertion, not attributed to a third party. As a result, journalists                 could be interpreted as expressing their own perspective on the topic at hand,                 rather than maintaining a neutralistic stance. Although the challenging nature of                 journalistic questions has been previously noted within the Australian context (e.g.                 Adkins, 1992), there have been few analyses of such challenges. Using the framework                 of conversation analysis, the aim of the following article is to examine adversarial                 challenges in more detail. In particular, the article will focus on how interviewers                 (IR) and interviewees (IE) collaboratively produce the political news interview in                 such a way as to avoid accusations of bias or non-neutrality. First, the article                 will focus on the challenging nature of the IR's turn, by examining the various                 techniques used by journalists to ensure that they maintain a neutralistic stance.                 Second, it will examine the way in which IEs respond to such adversarial challenges.                 It will show how although politicians do not overtly accuse IRs of bias or                 impartiality, they clearly orient to the challenging nature of the journalists' turn.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rendle-Short, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2007-11-08</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1750481307082205</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Neutralism and adversarial challenges in the political news interview]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>406</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2007-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>387</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://dcm.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/1/4/407?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Cooperation in interpreter-mediated monologic talk]]></title>
<link>http://dcm.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/1/4/407?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Discourse-based interpreting research has determined that interpreters are                 participants within interaction. Grice (1975) established that conversation                 participants conform to a <I>cooperative principle</I>. With respect to                 interpreting, what is the cooperative principle? How do sign language interpreters                 and deaf people work together to negotiate meaning in interpretation? The aim of                 this article is to present a case study of a deaf presenter and two sign language                 interpreters and evidence of their strategies for cooperation in                 interpreter-mediated monologic talk. Drawing on a framework of interactional                 sociolinguistics, naturalistic data from a seminar presentation was analysed,                 focusing on the use of pauses, nods and eye contact as contextualization cues in the                 interpreter-mediated event. It was found that these three participants used these                 cues deliberately and strategically for signalling comprehension, marking episodes,                 clarification and controlling the pace of the presentation; drawing on their frames                 of reference. Thus, the data suggest that the cooperative principle of interpreting                 involves the establishment of particular cues for communication.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Napier, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2007-11-08</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1750481307082206</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Cooperation in interpreter-mediated monologic talk]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>432</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2007-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>407</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://dcm.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/1/4/433?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Leadership and communication: discursive evidence of a workplace culture change]]></title>
<link>http://dcm.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/1/4/433?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Communication is an important component in the construction of workplace identities,                 including leader and group identities. Micro-level analysis of everyday workplace                 discourse provides valuable insights into the way leadership is constructed and how                 workplace culture is created, maintained, and changed. In this context, leaders and                 managers are inevitably significant and influential participants, with a crucial                 impact on workplace culture. Drawing on audio and video data collected in 12                 meetings of an IT department, the analysis demonstrates ways in which two leaders,                 who succeed each other in the role of Director, reinforce and shape the culture of                 the workplace in which they operate. While both leaders claim teamwork as an                 important cultural value for their teams, their respective instantiations of                 teamwork are rather different. To explore the leaders' effect on the culture of                 their department, this investigation of leadership change examines ways in which the                 leaders manage regular workplace meetings (communication with a predominantly                 transactional orientation) and how they contribute to workplace humour (more                 relationally oriented behaviour). The analysis provides detailed evidence of the                 ways in which a change in leadership style can create the conditions for a change in                 the culture of a community of practice.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Holmes, J., Schnurr, S., Marra, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2007-11-08</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1750481307082207</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Leadership and communication: discursive evidence of a workplace culture change]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>451</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2007-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>433</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://dcm.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/1/4/452?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Co-management in healthcare: negotiating professional boundaries]]></title>
<link>http://dcm.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/1/4/452?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>This article investigates discursive practices associated with the co-management of                 patients between healthcare providers. Specifically, we focus on two genres (38                 referral letters and 37 consultant reports) written by optometrists and                 ophthalmologists &mdash; two groups who are experiencing interprofessional                 tension over their scopes of practice. In our analysis we foreground four kinds of                 modality associated with verbs &mdash; epistemic, deontic, phatic and                 subjective. We found that these healthcare providers shared in the epistemic                 resources used to hedge their sense of clinical certainty, and that ophthalmologists                 used deontic resources to control future action. However, we also noted that both                 professions used deontic, phatic and subjective resources to create dialogical space                 for each other to participate in some future relationship. In fact, one of the main                 points of this correspondence might be to establish personal relationships between                 practitioners. Unfortunately, however, this subtle use of modality to negotiate                 professional boundaries is fading as many ophthalmologists, due to workload issues,                 are not responding to referral letters or are converting their correspondence to                 form letters.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Schryer, C. F., Gladkova, O., Spafford, M. M., Lingard, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2007-11-08</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1750481307082208</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Co-management in healthcare: negotiating professional boundaries]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>479</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2007-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>452</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://dcm.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/1/4/480?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Book review: EVIATAR ZERUBAVEL, The Elephant in the Room: Silence and Denial         in Everyday Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006, xi + 162 pp. ISBN 0195187172]]></title>
<link>http://dcm.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/1/4/480?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Burridge, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2007-11-08</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1750481307082234</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Book review: EVIATAR ZERUBAVEL, The Elephant in the Room: Silence and Denial         in Everyday Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006, xi + 162 pp. ISBN 0195187172]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>482</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2007-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>480</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://dcm.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/1/4/482?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Book review: LIA LITOSSELITI, Gender and Language: Theory and Practice. London: Hodder Arnold, 2006, 192 pp]]></title>
<link>http://dcm.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/1/4/482?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Conrick, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2007-11-08</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/17504813070010040502</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Book review: LIA LITOSSELITI, Gender and Language: Theory and Practice. London: Hodder Arnold, 2006, 192 pp]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>484</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2007-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>482</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://dcm.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/1/4/484?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Book review: DURK GORTER (ed.), Linguistic Landscape: A New Approach to         Multilingualism. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, 2006, LXXXIX + 89 pp., US$54.95, {pound}29.95]]></title>
<link>http://dcm.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/1/4/484?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Garcia Prudencio, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2007-11-08</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/17504813070010040503</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Book review: DURK GORTER (ed.), Linguistic Landscape: A New Approach to         Multilingualism. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, 2006, LXXXIX + 89 pp., US$54.95, {pound}29.95]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>486</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2007-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>484</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://dcm.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/1/4/486?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Book review: ELEMER HANKISS, The Toothpaste of Immortality: Self-Construction in the Consumer Age. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 2006, xvi + 425 pp., US$60.00 (hbk), US$24.95 (pbk)]]></title>
<link>http://dcm.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/1/4/486?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Koller, V.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2007-11-08</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/17504813070010040504</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Book review: ELEMER HANKISS, The Toothpaste of Immortality: Self-Construction in the Consumer Age. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 2006, xvi + 425 pp., US$60.00 (hbk), US$24.95 (pbk)]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>488</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2007-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>486</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

</rdf:RDF>